Editorial
The question of what is a political crime and who is a political criminal is very often raised in the mdeia. This question is also central in the the topical international debate on the contemporary phenomena of terrorism. The deifinition of political crime has been tyhe concern of the legal theory and jurisdiction since the introduction of the term in legal texts at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The distinct character of political offenders led to a "regime de faveur". Besides, one of the principles of the extradition law is still the non- extradition of political offenders.
In Classical Athens there was no distinction between ordinary and political crime. Nevertheless, crimes directed against the political system were severely punished, given that, to Atenians, democracy was the ideal regime. Crime against the Gods of Olympus was considered as a crime against the state and conversely treason had a sacriligeous character. However, there was a type of crime with political character that escaped severe punishment. This was the case with tyrannicide, whioch was regarded as the legitimate means to protect democracy. Someone, who killed the tyrant was not considered as a criminal but rather would be granted the honours of the champion of the olympic games.
Same is the scenartio with our political system today. However, to our surprise, a few positive changes have started to occur with the inception of young parliamentarians. We just need to move in the right direction the coming times by choosing the honest people who would further represent us and would work for eradicating social evils and bring prosperity throughout the nation.
By:
Sital Dass Katru,
Chief Editor
AZAD KANOONI SHIKANJA